news




Principals at Goochland Elementary, Randolph Elementary switch roles
Published: June 30, 2010
By Amy Condra
acondra@goochlandgazette.com

The principals of Goochland Elementary School and Randolph Elementary School will be switching positions for the upcoming school year.

This decision, and how it was made, has angered parents who feel that Superintendent Linda S. Underwood and the school board did not clearly explain how the reassignment will benefit the 700 students involved.

In an interview on Monday Underwood said that Dianna Gordon, principal of GES, and Stacey Austin, principal of RES, have each been at their respective schools for about six years.

“We know that both principals are highly thought of by their communities, and we knew there would be some negative reaction,” said Underwood, adding that she has been considering the move for a long time. “But even knowing the negative reaction, we want to do the right thing.”

She believes that Gordon and Austin each possess different skills and strengths that, when brought to a new setting, will increase the productivity of both teachers and students.

“Both principals have worked with their staff to get students to their highest achievement levels,” she said. “But a different set of eyes, a different approach can help (students) take the next few steps. We’re looking at increased achievement, always.”

Elizabeth Nelson-Lyda is a member of the GCPS Community Advisory Committee. She represents many parents whose children attend GES, and she said that most of the parents she has heard from in her district are elated to be welcoming Austin as their new principal.

“My neighbors are thinking, we get Stacy Austin, we hit the jackpot!” she said. “He is a great guy, why wouldn’t we be happy?”

But she says she has heard from some RES parents who are not pleased with the change.

“They felt a punishment was being inflicted,” said Nelson-Lyda. “But what they can’t see is that this is an administrative decision that is, from what I understand, necessary to achieve a specific outcome to precipitate a specific result.”

Nelson-Lyda added that it would be helpful, though, for parents to have a greater awareness of why the switch is taking place.

“What would be nice is to elicit from Underwood, if this is a decision made with a specific outcome in mind,” she said, “a greater understanding of what that specific outcome is so that we can know the gains RES and GES will get from this move.”

Not being told what those gains could be is frustrating to Jane Christie, whose youngest child will be attending RES in the fall.

“This affects everybody,” said Christie. “No matter how good these principals are, there was time spent building relationships with the community, students, parents and teachers.”

“There is bound to be a pain of adjustment and right now we don’t need that disruption,” she added, alluding to a difficult budget season that has only recently concluded. “What is the benefit of that disruption at this point in time?”

Parents who have had children in the GCPS center-based gifted center, a center that will be closed next year due to budget cuts, are frustrated that they had been encouraged to discuss plans for students who are transitioning to their home elementary schools with their children’s principals.

Now many of those parents are wondering if their opinions will still carry any weight with a new school administration.

“That point is well taken,” said Nelson-Lyda. “From parents, I heard this was contrary to being told to go back to their home principal, and that was a primary issue.”

“What concerns me is that we have lost 26 teachers, and have kids coming back from the (center-based) gifted program, and there is no plan yet,” said Christie.  “And add to that the difficulty of having a new principal, who doesn’t know these teachers and students.”

Beth Hardy, who, like Nelson-Lyda, is a member of the Community Advisory Committee, wrote in an e-mail Monday, sent to an undisclosed list of Goochland residents, that she has been contacted by about 40 people who are dissatisfied with the reassignment of RES and GES principals.

A petition and a letter-writing campaign are underway, she wrote, to communicate dissatisfaction with the decision made by Underwood and the school board.

Christie says that she and other parents are also unhappy that the change was made without advance notice to parents. 

A notice of the reassignments was not included in the original agenda packet and was not publicly read at the workshop meeting, she noted.

“No one at the meeting had any idea that it happened,” said Christie.

Underwood says that she did not want to release the information until she had a chance to speak with the principals involved.

“We were right down to the wire with the meeting,” she said. “I wanted to talk to Gordon and Austin as soon as school was out, but unfortunately each of them took off for a week.

The first time we could get together was the Tuesday of the meeting.”

Each principal has a relative who will also be affected by the change: Austin’s wife will be transferred from GES to RES, and Gordon’s daughter-in-law will be moved from RES to GES.



Reader Comments


RES Supporter of Crozier  |  Jul. 1, 2010, 12:04 PM

Jane - Well Said!


Jane Christie of United States  |  Jul. 1, 2010, 11:59 AM

If Dr. Underwood had indeed been planning this switch for a long time, doesn’t it seem a little curious that the fact that both Principals took a week’s holiday at the end of the school year somehow made it impossible to tell them any earlier? Surely that would suggest this decision was not made before that week!

Giving each Principal just 3 hour’s notice of the change before asking the School Board to vote on it does not come across as well-planned or professionally executed. If this was indeed planned in advance, then it shows a complete lack of respect for both of these principals, to deny both school communities the opportunity to give them a “send-off”, or to prepare any of the students for the fact they would have a new principal next year.

Yes, Dr. Underwood has the right to make these personnel decisions, and the budget decisions too. But the unbridled arrogance and lack of respect for people that she demonstrates over and again with her actions, do not, in my opinion, recommend her as a good leader for our County schools.

Jane.


RES Supporter of Crozier  |  Jul. 1, 2010, 10:48 AM

Just curious if CH has a child in any of the schools in question????

And apparently parents did not have a say in this decision, nor did either of the parties involved - sounds like the Board just did it.

Now the children don’t even have an opportunity to say proper good byes to either principal, they will just come in on the first day to a completely new principal.

Yes, change is a part of life, but unnecessary change is still disturbing.  With life the way it is today, if we can spare our kids a few changes and keep things within their educational process consistent, then I think that is best - especially when the change is taking a very inspirational person away from them…..


CH of Sandy Hook  |  Jul. 1, 2010, 09:45 AM

Change is a part of life, and our children need to get used to it.  PJ I don’t really see how putting a different principal that is well thought of and loved is damaging your child.  It means that they are fortunate enough to have known and loved two great educators…each offering different things to our schools.  To me it only means that they will be more rounded and our schools will be even better.  Shakin’ My Head you are sooooo right about Byrd.  If you’ve never been to the western part of our county, many of you would be surprised of the lower income families and kids that need a little extra help.  That school needs help also as it doesn’t have the parental support as our other schools. RES supporter, you do get a say by voting in who you think will make the right decisions.  If our school board wasn’t ready to vote they should have tabled the issue and had a special meeting later instead of second guessing their decision.  But what is done is done, and it is not a bad thing for either school or the children at either school.


RES Supporter of Croizer  |  Jul. 1, 2010, 08:58 AM

My daughter just graduated from Randolph, she went there from Kindgergarten through 5th - and any parent that has a child in or has had a child in Randolph will say that Mr. Austin IS Randolph.  He is the best principal I have ever dealt with, the children love, respect and trust him.

I feel terribly sad for the children that are left at Randolph and will lose this man in their lives after having him as part of their educational process for however long they’ve been at Randolph.

I think it is unfair for the county to let this man build this school up to where it is and then “reward” him by pulling him out and putting him somewhere else.

To the person who commented “since when do parents get to decide who the principal is” - I pay taxes in the county, have had experience with this principal and have seen what the results of his efforts are.  By paying taxes in this county I thought we all had a say in decisions that are made, especially when it concerns the education of our children.


Not Inspired of Goochland  |  Jul. 1, 2010, 07:06 AM

“We were right down to the wire with the meeting,” she said. “I wanted to talk to Gordon and Austin as soon as school was out, but unfortunately each of them took off for a week.”


Ummmm, you don’t know when your direct reporting employees are going on vacation?  Also, does she really refer to Ms Gordon and Mr Austin as “Gordon” and “Austin”? What are they, her pets?


Shakin' My Head of Sandy Hook, VA  |  Jun. 30, 2010, 09:12 PM

And once again, poor little Byrd Elementary school is left out of any changes like a redheaded step child. That’s the school that needs to be pulled up by the boot straps and brought out of the dark ages. The difference between RES and BES are far to long to list and too sad to mention. No offence to Mr. Hopkins but they need non-Goochland mentality to turn that school around.


PJ of Sandy Hook  |  Jun. 30, 2010, 03:12 PM

“Even knowing the reaction, we want to do the right thing.”

The RIGHT thing to do would have been to inform BOTH principals during the end of the school year and not summon them to Underwood’s office at 3:00pm the day prior to the School Board meeting to announce the switch.  How sad that all of the students how have known and loved these educators were left as collateral dammage.
Not to mention the fact that the School Board members, themselves unaware of this decision until less than 24 hours prior to their meeting, are now second-guessing their vote(s).

I’m sorry..since when has the superintendent done “the right thing”?????


Courtney Herzwurm of Sandy Hook  |  Jun. 30, 2010, 02:21 PM

Since when do parents get to decide who their principal is??  I don’t recall it ever being an option.  We have 2 well qualified, liked principals, and personally, I think it is a great idea.


Page 5 of 5 pages « First  <  3 4 5


Submit Your Comments Below

Name: (Required)

Email: (Required)

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:



By clicking submit, you agree to our terms and conditions.

Deal of the Day