news




Goochland District Court finds Pet Rescue Foundation guilty on eight misdemeanor counts
Published: September 29, 2010
By Ken Odor
jodor@goochlandgazette.com

Annette Thompson, operator of the Pet Rescue Foundation in Hadensville, was found guilty last Tuesday on eight counts of inadequate animal care, a Class IV misdemeanor charge.

She was ordered to pay a total of $856 in fines and court costs. The maximum possible penalty for a Class IV misdemeanor case is a $250 fine.

At the end of the almost three-hour long trial, Thompson’s attorney Darvin Satterwhite asked the court not to find her guilty.

“Any conviction would shut her down,” said Satterwhite to Judge Roger L. Morton, who took over the case from Goochland District Court Judge Edward Carpenter.

Satterwhite argued that if not for Thompson’s efforts, most of the dogs she has would be running loose with no care.

But Morton turned that argument aside.

“If you are going to help them, you’re going to have to take it all the way,” he said.

Morton said he had heard “enough evidence to convince me that these dogs did not receive adequate veterinary care.”

During the trial, which involved nine charges of inadequate animal care brought by four complainants,  the court heard testimony of dogs adopted from Thompson that were found to be suffering from heartworms, ear infections, bad teeth and other problems.

One case involved an older dog, “Elizabeth,” with pressure sores, heartworms, hookworms, arthritis, ear infections and anemia.

Veterinarian Dr. Martin Tohill of Chantilly Animal Hospital in Northern Virginia testified when questioned by complainant Maria Cline that “all of these conditions are preventable.”

But when questioned by Satterwhite, Dr. Tohill said he had not contacted the authorities in this case to report animal abuse.

Another case involved a now adopted dog that had been tethered on a short chain.

Veterinarian Dr. Daniel A. Kovich of the state Office of Veterinary Services stated that “In my opinion the chain was too short for the animal for the animal to receive adequate exercise.”

But when questioned by Satterwhite, Dr. Kovich said he did not request charges be filed by Animal Control, although Goochland Animal Control did receive a letter summarizing observations from Dr. Kovich’s inspection of February 5, 2009.

An inspection by Goochland Animal Control in March of this year resulted in a generally favorable report on Thompson’s operation.

Thompson can appeal her conviction to Goochland Circuit Court, said Judge Morton.

“We feel that her being found guilty of these charges is a victory for the animals but just one step of many to get them off her property and into places where they can be properly cared for,” said Sue Bell, one of the four complainants and Executive Director of Homeward Trails Animal Rescue in Northern Virginia.

The eight misdemeanor convictions ended an eight-month long saga of court hearings and continuances begun in March, which included the inclusion of a private prosecutor after the Goochland Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office declined to prosecute.

That decision was then reversed by Judge Morton after Judge Carpenter had second thoughts about his decision to allow a private prosecutor.

Kovich said later in the week that the process to determine whether the Pet Rescue Foundation is a “home-based releasing agency” or whether the animals are privately owned by Thompson is currently underway.

If determined to be a releasing agency, Thompson would be limited to 50 dogs and could not have any convictions for animal neglect, said Kovich.

Thus the guilty verdicts for inadequate animal care could result in her being prohibited from keeping animals if her operation is indeed determined to be a releasing agency, he said.

Calls to Thompson’s attorney Darvin Satterwhite and veterinarian Dr. Martin Tohill had not been returned at press time.



Reader Comments


Mary Lou of Goochland  |  Oct. 25, 2010, 01:23 PM

Hey miK, learn how to spell before you call someone else (Kim) stupid.  Take your third grade education and get lost.

And Rick - what you do to help Thompson is NOTHING.  As someone else said, I was in court and I didn’t see you there.


Mary Lou of Goochland  |  Oct. 25, 2010, 01:21 PM

Good name Rick?  Now that’s funny.  Thompson is a hoarder and you’re an ignorant fool.  Someone suggested you go live at her property for a while.  Have you done that yet?

Food and shelter?  Have you been there?  They live OUTSIDE.  That’s not shelter, genius.

You’re as dumb as those redneck Animal Control “officers”.

She’s going to lose her appeal too and hopefully all of the animals will be removed from the drunk.


rick jarrell of goochland  |  Oct. 8, 2010, 06:32 AM

Clara i see you finally came oughta the closet . what i do to help Ms. Thompson is none of your business . i dont need to signify like you people do .  to assume anything about me would be foolish . i help anyone i can . that includes you Clara .
  and the lies about how her animals dont have shelter and food and water are totally unfounded and unproven . i have seen homeless people who would love to have the conditions her dogs have .
    have a nice day Clara !


Clara Wojciechowski of Richmond  |  Oct. 6, 2010, 06:15 AM

Rick, thank you for your response. There will be no need to reply further to me (c’ville since you wanted to know my name) for your sudden silence speaks volumes and confirms my suspicions. I find it amusing that you have commented on almost every single article in this case never stating once that you have helped Annette in any way. You also wrote that you couldn’t make it to court. You had months to prepare to take off a day from work or make alternative arrangements so you could support her when she needed it the most. That’s a sign of a true friend. The only comments that you have written over and over again are thanking her for her dedication. I have yet to see one valid fact from you.

I’ve been following the case in its entirety as I used to be a volunteer donating not only my time but also my money before I realized the extent of the animals’ suffering and that Annette was going to do NOTHING to fix the problems and conntinue to allow the animals to live in horrific conditions.

So you see I just wanted to see what kind of excuse you would type. I also will no longer reply to your childish ignorant rants until you make some intelligent points. But alas I have a feeling we won’t hear the end of you unfortunately who never knew what was going on at PRF in the first place.

And Confused of Goochland, I didn’t know that about animal control but must say it does not surprise me in the least. What a sad state of affairs for any animal to be caught in the Goochland County pound with little chance of ever being adopted to a caring home. Shame on them for not giving EVERY dog a chance at life.


miK of richmond of richmond  |  Oct. 5, 2010, 03:04 PM

Kim is that why you dont post your last name . do you have a record you are hiding ? are you an accessary to a crime ? I will not post again because I feel like I am talking to a stupid wall….Yes, you, Kim . Just go away, you are making yourself look very stupid.


Rick Jarrell of sandyhook  |  Oct. 5, 2010, 02:48 PM

Kim go ahead . im clean as a whistle . first lie you tell about me and you will hear from my lawyer . this case is far from over . obviously you know little about it or you would know it is on appeal .
  bring it on !
  remember one thing i dont play when it comes to my good name .


Kim of Richmond  |  Oct. 5, 2010, 11:33 AM

Rick…
When you allow animals in your care to suffer, you are neglectful. Period. Accused, tried, found quilty!  The debate is over.  I will not post again because I feel like I am talking to a stupid wall….Yes, you, Rick.  Just go away, you are making yourself look very stupid.  I am getting ready to look you up to see if you really exist as who you say you are too and if I don’t find you, I will, in this public forum accuse you of lots more, like maybe being an accessory to a crime????  Who knows what you have to hide.


Rick Jarrell of goochland  |  Oct. 5, 2010, 11:25 AM

Donnna you dont exist without a last name . If you beleive it sign your name , otherwise hide behind the ” veil of cowards ” with your correspondance .
  C’Ville same goes for you i dont respond to people who cant even seem to use their name . Without your name your post does not exist .
    So far Belle has called her a drunk and Donna has called her a nut in a public forum . i hope you know even though you are scared to print your name you are still liable and can be found for judicial purposes .


Donna of Goochland  |  Oct. 4, 2010, 11:44 AM

Hey - maybe Rick wants to go live on Thompson’s property - outside in the cold.  How about it?


Donna of Goochland  |  Oct. 4, 2010, 11:27 AM

The dogs all live outside too - in freezing cold and 100+ degree weather.  They get no attention and spend their entire lives in kennels. 

Waiting to see how Rick has helped his CONVICTED friend Annette.

Even Thompson’s lawyer knows that she’s a nut.


Page 1 of 3 pages  1 2 3 >


Submit Your Comments Below

Name: (Required)

Email: (Required)

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:



By clicking submit, you agree to our terms and conditions.

Deal of the Day