news




Charges filed against Goochland’s Pet Rescue Foundation operator Annette Thompson
Published: March 17, 2010
By Ken Odor
jodor@goochlandgazette.com New: Read the Animal Control investigation notes

Two Class IV misdemeanor charges against Pet Rescue Foundation operator Annette Thompson stem from a months-long investigation by animal welfare advocate Eileen McAfee.

In an interview last week with The Gazette, Henrico resident McAfee said that more than 60 additional cases had been presented to the Goochland Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office for possible action.

Those charges were contained in a 150-page document provided to Goochland Animal Control and the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office by McAfee.

“She should not be allowed to have animals – she abuses them,” said McAfee last week, who said she has been involved in animal advocacy work for the last 15 years, mostly with pounds run by localities.

“I want the Pet Rescue Foundation shut down, but that’s not enough.  She needs to be prosecuted for abuse of the animals in her care just as any other citizen who abuses animals is charged, but also to prevent her from starting up her operation all over again,” said McAfee.

McAfee has a background in social work and criminal justice. She is a co-founder of Save Our Shelters, a rescue, adoption and advocacy organization for pound animals, and was the director from 2003 - 2006 of Court Watch for Animal Cruelty in Richmond, Chesterfield, Henrico and Hanover.

Deputy Commonwealth’s Attorney Nancy Oglesby said Monday she had reviewed the cases and had advised McAfee to meet with Chief Magistrate Sheena Dixon concerning the complaints, since none rose to the class 1 misdemeanor level which would involve the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office.

The first two charges arose after McAfee and a group of more than 10 other concerned animal advocates, many of whom had volunteered at the Pet Rescue Foundation, met with Animal Control and the Goochland County Attorney on February 23. After the meeting two complaints were filed by one of the animal advocates against Thompson.

An April 12 trial date in Goochland District Court has been set for the two charges.

According to McAfee, over the last several years volunteers and rescue organizations had become concerned after attempting to help Thompson with her operation.

The state Office of Veterinary Services (OVS) visited Thompson’s facility twice in the last five years in response to complaints, said McAfee, who provided The Gazette copies of letters sent to Animal Control by the OVS as a result of those visits.

In the December 21, 2005, letter, OVS requested Animal Control follow-up and provided an update on action taken to correct a number of deficiencies the inspection noted, including frozen water dishes, insufficient cleaning of feces from dog runs and inadequate shelter.

Animal Control Officer Robert “Corky” Marks said Monday that retired Animal Control Officer Richard Bradner followed up on the deficiencies noted in that report.

OVS visited the Pet Foundation again on February 5, 2009, in response to anonymous complaints that animals were not being properly fed. On this visit an “emaciated” horse was reported, which, according to Marks, was subsequently euthanized. The horse is the subject of one of the two misdemeanor charges pending against Thompson.

Three members of the Goochland Animal Control, accompanied by a Goochland County Deputy Sheriff, inspected the facility on March 5, 2010, according to a written report provided to the Gazette by the County Attorney’s Office.  They found 106 dogs on the property, along with about 30 cats, chickens, two rabbits, seven goats, three sheep and three horses.

“There were no companion animals or livestock in need of emergency vet care,” the report stated.

Animal Control has visited Thompson’s facility more than 75 times over the years in response to complaints, said Marks.

On the most current visit Marks said Animal Control did have concerns about four older dogs. According to attachments to the report, Dr. James Miller examined three of the dogs on March 8 and treatment plans were agreed upon.

Dr. Richard Owens of Locke A. Taylor DVM, Inc. treated the fourth dog, according to the report.

Overall, Marks said his impression of the facility was favorable.

“It is top notch – in number one shape,” said Marks. “Some of the animals are borderline obese.”

Marks added Thompson told him that she now has two paid employees to assist her with the care of animals at the facility.

Oglesby said it would be up to Magistrate Dixon to decide if more charges against Thompson are brought after hearing any future complaints that might be brought before her by McAfee or other concerned citizens.


 

 

 



Reader Comments


Mary of Goochland  |  Mar. 29, 2011, 01:06 PM

The vet records detail horrible neglect.


zirklet of Martinsburg, WV  |  May. 25, 2010, 10:54 PM

I am amazed at the mean and vicious things that are being said.  I know noone that is perfect.  I was once told if you can’t say anything nice you shouldn’t say anything at all.


Concerned Citizen of the Animals of Goochland  |  May. 25, 2010, 08:11 PM

The trial has been delayed until July 12th. The prosecution is allowed to have legal representation so they are very pleased with the recent developments.


Michelle of Goochland  |  May. 25, 2010, 06:51 PM

So guess what happened to the crazy old drunk in court today?


zirklet of Martinsburg,WV  |  May. 25, 2010, 04:45 PM

I know Annette personally and know that she works 24/7 caring for the animals.  I agree it is none of anyones business where she gets her money.  She has a heart of gold when it comes to the animals.  I myself have adopted from her and I couldn’t be more pleased.  It sounds like Patti is too busy condemning which she could be put her energies to something positive like Annette


Christy of Richmond  |  Apr. 17, 2010, 10:28 AM

Medal?  What does that mean?


Oliver North of Richmond  |  Apr. 13, 2010, 07:45 PM

Eileen McAfee has a history of being disruptive
this is from a court file:
“McAfee was removed from the Shelter on three occasions in 1998,as a result of confrontations between her and the Richmond Animal Shelter officials. She was first removed from the Shelter on January 15, 1998, when she interfered with Deale’s discussions with a patron,accusing Deale of being a liar. On this date a man came into the Shelter looking for his lost dog, and Deale told the man that the only dog in the isolation and euthanasia rooms was a beagle. McAfee intervened
in the conversation, calling out to Deale in the presence of the patron, “Is that true that the only dog in there is a beagle? You know,
you’ve lied before.” Deale ordered McAfee out of the Shelter.”


Janet Morrison of Goochland  |  Apr. 7, 2010, 01:57 PM

where can we see these?  maybe people will realize that your right and that annetta needs to be closed down 4ever.  she is bad 4 the aninmals.


Eileen McAfee of Richmond  |  Apr. 7, 2010, 12:37 PM

On 4/6/10, 13 more Summonses were served on Annette Thompson.


Derrick Weaver of Goochland  |  Mar. 31, 2010, 09:01 AM

After reading all these comments, it seems to me that Ms. Stinson has some sort of vendetta toward Mrs. Thompson. Let me make a few corrections based on my first-hand observations.

In one post, Ms. Stinson says there are NO buildings and that all dogs are outside. While I grant her that there are outdoor pens (no different than most shelters I’ve been to), there are also buildings that she has made use of.

In another post, Ms Stinson states that dogs walk among their own filth. I know first hand that the pens are cleaned DAILY. This is the same accusation that the SPCA and other shelters have faced in the past. Dogs poop! And unlike cats (who centralize it away from their living quarters and food), dogs go wherever they please.

Another post stated that Mrs. Thompson did not properly vet her animals. Poppycock! Every animal there has vaccination records. In addition, Mrs. Thompson saves money by doing a lot of routine things herself (which she learned from licensed vets).

One other post that Ms Stinson put up mentioned Mrs. Thompson’s living arrangements (her trailer). While personally, I believe that is part of Mrs. Thompson’s personal life and is not of anyone’s concern, I will address that briefly. Yes, she may be living in a trailer right now. What was not mentioned was the fact that the trailer is right behind her house which is being completely rebuilt. And because of Mrs. Thompson’s total dedication to her animals, she has invested more in them than in herself, which is why the building is still in process.

I could go on, but I have other things to do. Ms. Stinson, you may THINK you know all about the situation, but you do not. You do not even live in the area (Reston is about 3hours away from this shelter; over 100 mi)!

It is unfortunate that someone who has devoted her life to these animals must take crap from you and others like you who do not fully understand or appreciate the situation. Instead, like many do, you have taken minor details and twisted them to make this woman look like a monster.

Ms. Stinson, I pity you.


Page 1 of 5 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »


Submit Your Comments Below

Name: (Required)

Email: (Required)

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:



By clicking submit, you agree to our terms and conditions.

Deal of the Day